KylePaice.com

My 3 favorite feeds at the moment:

1. PhilaLawyer.net: An anonymously written blog about the dark side of the legal profession. Most of his older stuff was compiled into a book, Happy Hour is For Amateurs. Since then, PhilaLawyer writes on a variety of subjects outside of law -- options for graduating seniors, the economy -- all with the same dark humor. His "Commencement '09, If I Was Giving the Speech" was awesome.
2. Paul Graham: Founder of Y Combinator, an awesome seed-stage venture capital firm. His essays are awesome. Rarely updated (relative to other blogs), but always worth the read.
3. Football Outsiders: The more I follow sports, the more I get sick of ESPN, SI, and the like. Football Outsiders is run by the same group of buddies who created Baseball Prospectus (another favorite). Instead of listening to the talking heads' baseless assumptions, check out FO, where they use regression analysis and a variety of other statistical tools to craft their arguments.
   

I'm obsessive about my RSS feeds. I read through them daily, and delete feeds weekly. The fastest way to get an unsubscribe from me is to be a "me-too" blog.

Let me explain. Paul Graham or Rands will write something brilliant. It will change the way I think about a particular subject, or at least make me question my assumptions. Then (within 24 hours) the ripple effect begins. The "me-too" posts pop up all over my "Product Development" folder in Google Reader.

There's never much point in reading these "me too" posts, as they're all the same. A few quick paragraphs that either agree or disagree with the original article. The agreements are all half-assed plagiarizations. The criticisms explain why something is a "FAIL", while adding nothing to the overall conversation. It's reactionary blogging, and we're all getting dumber reading it.

The whole point of my weekly RSS sweep is to delete these "me-too's" before I waste any more of my time on them. I'm confident enough in my analytical ability to stick to reading only primary sources like Graham and Rands. I don't need amateur pundits to tell me what a 300-word blog post REALLY means. 

What are other dead giveaways that you're reading a "me-too" blog? Let me know what I've missed in the comments.

Dress requirements at my old job were business casual, which basically means a dress shirt and slacks for guys, and whatever the hell a female feels like wearing (short of jeans).

There were three ways that a guy could go with this:

The Spencer Pratt: Last I checked, we were working 100 yards from the NYSE, not going clubbing with the cast of The Hills. You know the type. If you saw one of these guys sweating in the middle of a meeting, it was because they were actively restraining themselves from shouting "Ya Dood!" after anyone finished a sentence (I call this "Jersey Tourette's").

The George Michael Bluth: I hate suits more than anything in this world, but even I wouldn't wear a polo and khaki's to the office. It was like they were leaving to go chaperone an 8th grade dance or something. Even I was never this egregious.

Everyone Else: The standard. Nice shirt, nice pants, nice shoes. Tie and jacket if you're with a client that day. Whatever.

When I transferred up to the firm's Boston office, we had casual Fridays the first week of every month. I got excited. So I showed up the first day with a nice pair of jeans on, a new pair of New Balances, and a Lacoste polo. Nice enough, right?

Wrong. Apparently even though this was casual Friday, you still had to wear dress shoes and tuck in whatever shirt you were wearing. How this makes sense, I have no idea. Their mentality, as with everything else, was "be grateful we're even letting you wear jeans to begin with."

Fast forward a year later, and my new gig obviously has no dress code. Most of us still look decent enough, with collared shirts and nice jeans. I have no problem with a button-down and jeans every once in a while, but how great is it to roll out of bed, throw on a hoodie and a Sox hat and go straight to work?

I know, I know. Lately I've started to push this whole "no dress code" thing to it's outermost limits. For the past few weeks, I've been shaving once a week, and wearing hoodies and hats every day. But who cares? I'm still bathing (for now), and I get all my stuff done. That should be (and now is) all that matters.

Fellow HubSpotter Michelle effectively summed up my new approach to office fashion with the following:

"It's like you're in your Al Gore post-VP phase. He dressed up for years because he had to, and then once he got out he started doing and wearing whatever he wanted. It certainly worked out for him, too. Just look at An Inconvenient Truth and the Nobel Prize he won for it."

I was reading Steve Jobs' Wikipedia page today, and this quote totally stopped me.

"Do you want to spend the rest of your life selling sugared water to children, or do you want a chance to change the world?"

This sums it up perfectly for me. Sure, you can stay in that cushy corporate job for the rest of your life. You can sit comfortably above a group of people, and still have a bunch of supervisors above you to pass the buck to. Do what you're told, shuffle some papers around (none of which really mean anything), and not rock the boat in the slightest. Then you can call it a life at 65.

Yeah, you might grow wealthy in the process, but really: What have you accomplished? You entered an organization that was already firmly established, shuffled around within it for a while, and then left. If you think about it (or have worked at a large company), you realize it's really not that hard. Stressful at times, but never actually difficult.

So far, it's been MUCH more interesting to take on some real responsibility, and try to help build something great.

I always used to think that people who ran around the office or had two cell phones on the table during lunch were super important. That they had so much going on in their lives that they had to have two dedicated numbers (and a wireless internet card) to keep up with it all. I thought I was important to have these multiple modes of communication.

As with all of my other expectations about life in Corporate America, I was completely wrong.

You don't have two cell phones because you are important. You have two cell phones so that the important people can find you, and then shovel all of the miscellaneous crap they don't feel like doing into your inbox. That's why you've got to be reachable, because your time isn't your own. You've got the electronic leash to prove it.

That CrackBerry is your all-purpose excuse-remover. You'll get e-mails at three in the morning: A client threw a temper-tantrum in that night's meeting because the PowerPoint presentation wasn't in 12-point Arial font. And guess what? That had better be fixed and sent back out before your 7:30am meeting the next morning. What? You were asleep? Bull. You have a BlackBerry. Keep the ringer on. You're supposed to be on top of these things, that's why we give you the damn thing.

The real-life Ari Gold wouldn't have more than one cell phone - and there's no way in hell anyone other than his assistant and wife would have the number. Being unreachable, that's power.

It was our first day at the firm. They'd herded about a hundred of us fresh-faced college grads into a conference room built for fifty.

We all walked in with a deserved (we thought) swagger, because the hard part had been done. We'd gone to the right schools, gotten the right jobs, and were getting sweet compensation packages with big signing bonuses. Our lives were going to be on autopilot for the next forty years, during which we'd grow rich, happy, fulfilled, and generally be the envy of everyone we knew.

Then a bell rang. Thinking it was someone's mobile, I ignored it. As the sound got louder, I turned to see a thirty-something HR executive shaking a servant's bell in our faces. No one moved. We were told the bell meant it was time for us to take our seats. Her tone was patronizing, like she was speaking to small children (or someone about to jump off a bridge).

Looking across at everyone's faces, it looked like that scene in A Bronx Tale where Sonny locks the door to the Chez Bip and says to the biker gang, "Now you's can't leave."

Crap. I'd already blown away half my bonus on bars and other frivolous crap during my senior year of college, and -- judging by everyone's expressions -- I was pretty sure most of the others had too. We'd have to work for two years before our bonuses vested (meaning we were legally obligated to pay it all back if we left before then).

It was the ultimate "All Your Base Are Belong to Us" moment. For better or worse, they owned us. So I did the only thing that made sense: Lied to myself and said this sort of ridiculousness was an isolated incident.